Prophylactic nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), also known as chronic lung disease (CLD), is the most common serious morbidity associated with premature birth, particularly among those infants who have respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and receive mechanical ventilation after birth. BPD is characterized by lung inflammation and scarring, which are thought to be the effects of excessive (or inadequate) ventilator pressure or volume. Mechanisms of injury that have been explored are barotrauma (lung trauma due to the use of excessive pressure during ventilation), volutrauma (trauma due to the use of excessive ventilation volumes), and atelectotrauma (trauma due to the collapse of alveoli after the use of inadequate ventilation volumes), among others [1]. Various strategies have been developed to avoid the use of mechanical ventilation which would, presumably, limit lung damage and reduce the incidence of BPD. Indeed, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) has been used for decades to treat RDS, and it is a less invasive form of respiratory support that maintains functional residual capacity, improves ventilation‐perfusion mismatch, and minimizes damage to the neonatal lungs. Recently, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), which provides mechanical “sigh” breaths in addition to NCPAP, has been used to treat RDS as well. While it is becoming widely accepted that these gentler forms of ventilation may spare premature infants’ lungs and improve clinical outcomes, it is still unclear whether NCPAP or NIPPV offers a greater reduction in important morbidities of prematurity, most notably BPD. We intend to search the current literature for all randomized, controlled trials and to combine these results for a meta‐analysis for the Neonatal Cochrane Collaboration comparing mortality and BPD, among other important morbidities, in neonates randomized to one of these two methods of respiratory support.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Treatment Response of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants: Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Early Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Background Infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS) is one of the main causes of serious complications and death in preterm infants. Both Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) are known as the most common treatment strategies for IRDS. The present study intended to compare NCPAP and NIPPV in the treatment of preterm inf...
متن کاملEffectiveness of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants after Less Invasive Surfactant Administration
Background Non-invasive ventilation is increased used in preterm infants. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) after less invasive surfactant administration (LISA). Materials and Methods In this clinical trial, eighty ...
متن کاملEarly Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Infants of 28-36 weeks gestational age: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) has emerged as a primary modality of respiratory support for preterm infants withrespiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, 30%-40% of these newborns need subsequent mechanical ventilation. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a promising alternative to NCPAP, especially in po...
متن کاملA Comparison between Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Background: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a non-invasive ventilatory mode, which delivers mechanical ventilation via nasal tubes or prongs. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of NIPPV and nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (NCPAP) in reducing the need for intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)....
متن کاملComparison of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy with and without Prophylactic Surfactant in Preterm Neonates
Background: Preterm labor is at risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and sometimes requires to mechanical ventilation (MV) and surfactant therapy. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Nasal Continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) are the methods of respiratory support especially for using in RDS of neonates. In other method surfactant is administered to babies via tracheal...
متن کامل